<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sabrina Dent &#187; brand identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabrinadent.com/tag/brand-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com</link>
	<description>Web Design * Development * Marketing Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your Brand is Not a Sacred Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2010/01/17/your-brand-is-not-a-sacred-cow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2010/01/17/your-brand-is-not-a-sacred-cow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina Dent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crankypants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabrinadent.com/?p=1544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a really common scenario: You get a new client and they have a great product but no brand. Let&#8217;s say they make, I dunno, cow print toys or clothing or something, so you futz around for a while and decide to call the company Cowlabunga. (Just roll with me here.) You get to work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1548" title="Cowlabunga! The World's Best... Something." src="http://sabrinadent.handelaar.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/cowlabunga.png" alt="Cowlabunga! The World's Best... Something." width="415" height="175" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a really common scenario:</p>
<p>You get a new client and they have a great product but no brand. Let&#8217;s say they make, I dunno, cow print toys or clothing or something, so you futz around for a while and decide to call the company <strong>Cowlabunga</strong>. (Just roll with me here.) You get to work and develop strong visuals for print and web and awesome messaging for use everywhere. The client loves everything, and then &#8211; after having stared at this shit for 60 hours &#8211; they have a crisis of faith.</p>
<p>Normally, these crises are some combination of the following:</p>
<p><strong>1. They get hung up on the pronunciation.</strong> Is it cow-la-bunga or cool-a-bunga? Will people get confused? Frankly, it doesn&#8217;t matter &#8211; you say potato, I say patatoe, but everybody is clear about what vegetable we&#8217;re discussing. Is <a title="Vimeo" href="http://www.vimeo.com/">Vimeo</a> pronounced <em>vi-may-oh</em> or <em>vi-me-oh</em>? I have no idea and care even less; I can spell it, find it, and host my videos on it, so whatever &#8211; it works.</p>
<p><strong>2. They get literal with the logo.</strong> People who are new at starting or leading companies are universally obsessed by their own logo. And the telecom guy <em>always</em> wants a phone, the real estate guy <em>always</em> wants a house and everyone in anything to do with discounts <em>always</em> wants to dick around with currency symbols.</p>
<p>Even in 1971, <a title="History of the Nike swoosh" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swoosh">Nike&#8217;s designer</a> knew you don&#8217;t do that. Your logo does not need to be literal to be clear. Nobody thinks McDonald&#8217;s sells arches, and nobody thinks Nike sells swooshes.</p>
<p>A logo need not &#8211; and often arguably should not &#8211; be representative of the specific product the company sells or the specific service it delivers. That is <em>not</em> the job of a logo. Thinking that the logo is what defines a brand or is even the most important part of the brand experience means that someone has no understanding of <a title="Wikipedia on branding" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand">what branding is</a> and probably should not be trusted to market a company.</p>
<p><strong>3. They get hung up on the logo. </strong>Once the logo is agreed, clients tend to think it&#8217;s cast in stone. It shouldn&#8217;t be, because you absolutely can play with it. <a title="Google holiday logos" href="http://www.google.com/logos/">Google does</a>. The <a title="Three" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/">BBC does</a>. The <a title="See nav bar and address in footer" href="http://www.newmuseum.org/">New Museum of Contemporary Art</a> does, too, rendering the words NEW and MUSEUM in a consistent type face and sticking whatever they want between them.</p>
<p>The static logo <a title="Dynamic logo examples" href="http://www.johnsonbanks.co.uk/thoughtfortheweek/index.php?thoughtid=210">is dead</a>, and thank God for that because if I have to fuck up one more website, flyer or poster because some sponsor&#8217;s logo MUST have a 30mm white surround, I&#8217;m going to start taking hostages. Your logo is a tool, not a monolith; it&#8217;s there to be used, not preserved as a sacred cow.</p>
<p>I would suggest, however, that you <em>not</em> call your company Cowlabunga. It sounds like a foot disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2010/01/17/your-brand-is-not-a-sacred-cow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
