<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Adventures of Invisible Elephant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabrinadent.com/2009/03/05/the-adventures-of-invisible-elephant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2009/03/05/the-adventures-of-invisible-elephant/</link>
	<description>Web Design * Development * Marketing Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WillKnott.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m (not) everywoman</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2009/03/05/the-adventures-of-invisible-elephant/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>WillKnott.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;m (not) everywoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabrinadent.com/?p=1061#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>[...] expert what is Maryrose Lyons. And to the best, and probably most fun, web designer that is Sabrina Dent. To women who actually get thing done, like Laura Czajkowski and Alexia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border-left: 1px solid #CC3399; padding: 10px;">
<p>[...] expert what is Maryrose Lyons. And to the best, and probably most fun, web designer that is Sabrina Dent. To women who actually get thing done, like Laura Czajkowski and Alexia [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulSweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2009/03/05/the-adventures-of-invisible-elephant/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulSweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabrinadent.com/?p=1061#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Just to say that Sabrina did so much more work than anyone could reasonably expect. She makes me look good, what can I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to say that Sabrina did so much more work than anyone could reasonably expect. She makes me look good, what can I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowan Manahan</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2009/03/05/the-adventures-of-invisible-elephant/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan Manahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabrinadent.com/?p=1061#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts Sabrina and a really sharp presentation. I downloaded the PDF and the look-and-feel is carried through just perfectly there too.

I&#039;m not sure I agree with your point about the presentation having to make sense on its own though. Supported as this one is with the script in PDF form, you could have made the PPT even less wordy.

My thinking is that we know the visual channel and the aural channel work very well together for an audience, and that comprehension and retention drop sharply as soon as the audience have to read anything. Therefore the presentation needs to be built around that certainty. Let the presentation be the presentation and the handout be the handout and rarely should the twain meet.

One approach I have found useful for SlideShare is to use drop-in text boxes to provide the narration and linkage points. The presentation I deliver looks largely the same as the one on SlideShare, but those boxes make sense of some of the more cryptic imagery in the narrative to people who come to SlideShare afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts Sabrina and a really sharp presentation. I downloaded the PDF and the look-and-feel is carried through just perfectly there too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with your point about the presentation having to make sense on its own though. Supported as this one is with the script in PDF form, you could have made the PPT even less wordy.</p>
<p>My thinking is that we know the visual channel and the aural channel work very well together for an audience, and that comprehension and retention drop sharply as soon as the audience have to read anything. Therefore the presentation needs to be built around that certainty. Let the presentation be the presentation and the handout be the handout and rarely should the twain meet.</p>
<p>One approach I have found useful for SlideShare is to use drop-in text boxes to provide the narration and linkage points. The presentation I deliver looks largely the same as the one on SlideShare, but those boxes make sense of some of the more cryptic imagery in the narrative to people who come to SlideShare afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
