<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can I get my donated blood back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/</link>
	<description>Web Design * Development * Marketing Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-34</guid>
		<description>That question is difficult to answer because of the definition of &quot;elective cesarean&quot; which is what you&#039;re asking about. The term covers any woman who has a cesarean without going into labour, for &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; reason - from high maternal blood pressure (where a cesarean may be medically indicated) to simple maternal preference (where there is no medical indication).

However, in the US, which has similar rates of c-section which are similarly rising, about 28% of cesarean sections were elective in 2005, and 72% were emergency cesareans. So some percentage of your 28% will be maternal request, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That question is difficult to answer because of the definition of &#8220;elective cesarean&#8221; which is what you&#8217;re asking about. The term covers any woman who has a cesarean without going into labour, for <em>any</em> reason &#8211; from high maternal blood pressure (where a cesarean may be medically indicated) to simple maternal preference (where there is no medical indication).</p>
<p>However, in the US, which has similar rates of c-section which are similarly rising, about 28% of cesarean sections were elective in 2005, and 72% were emergency cesareans. So some percentage of your 28% will be maternal request, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Of the 72% increase in C-sections, how many of these were requested by the mothers? I accept that the figure is very high and may point to something untoward taking place but I also feel that this is a legitimate question as it ties in with the general theme of this thread. Some woman prefer c-section deliveries over vaginal deliveries for various reasons. T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the 72% increase in C-sections, how many of these were requested by the mothers? I accept that the figure is very high and may point to something untoward taking place but I also feel that this is a legitimate question as it ties in with the general theme of this thread. Some woman prefer c-section deliveries over vaginal deliveries for various reasons. T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Major</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-32</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s a debating point with no definitive answer, though, hence my saying it’s even odds.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ll give to you 2-1 on that being true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s a debating point with no definitive answer, though, hence my saying it’s even odds.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give to you 2-1 on that being true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Louis I&#039;m sure everyone made all the right decisions and nothing you could have done would have changed the circumstances of your daughter&#039;s birth. At the end you got a healthy baby and (I presume) a healthy mother and that&#039;s fabulous.

But your individual case study aside, the broader fact remains: 72% increase in c-sections in 10 years. That points to something being very off in maternity wards, is what I&#039;m saying. If we&#039;re talking of &quot;do no harm&quot; as you mentioned earlier, I&#039;d just point out that c-sections have a complications rate four times higher than vaginal births. If a significant percentage of the cesareans taking place in Ireland are indeed medically unnecessary, that is putting women at serious risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis I&#8217;m sure everyone made all the right decisions and nothing you could have done would have changed the circumstances of your daughter&#8217;s birth. At the end you got a healthy baby and (I presume) a healthy mother and that&#8217;s fabulous.</p>
<p>But your individual case study aside, the broader fact remains: 72% increase in c-sections in 10 years. That points to something being very off in maternity wards, is what I&#8217;m saying. If we&#8217;re talking of &#8220;do no harm&#8221; as you mentioned earlier, I&#8217;d just point out that c-sections have a complications rate four times higher than vaginal births. If a significant percentage of the cesareans taking place in Ireland are indeed medically unnecessary, that is putting women at serious risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Cipher</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Cipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to pull you up there, during the nine months of my partners pregnancy, I attended all of the relevant classes,  all of the required scans, read all of the literature on pregnancy etc.

Yet when the day arrived and things started to go wrong this knowledge counted for absolutely nothing. In the heat of the moment decisions had to be made which would affect the outcome of the delivery and off all the people in the room both myself and my partner were the least qualified to make those decison, despite the research we had done. Pressing all the keys on a piano once does not make you a pianist just as &quot;reading&quot; about birth trauma etc does not gurantee that you will be in a position to make the &quot;right&quot; decsion at the time.

I&#039;m not overly confident in the medical system in this country but last year over 8000 babies were delivered in the Coombe so the system must be working to some degree. Could it be better? Of course. Do doctors make mistakes? yes they do! Should they be held accountable? Absolutely. But IMHO, ultimately it is doctors and nurses who have both the academic and practical knowledge which gives them the edge over lay folk during any medical procedure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to pull you up there, during the nine months of my partners pregnancy, I attended all of the relevant classes,  all of the required scans, read all of the literature on pregnancy etc.</p>
<p>Yet when the day arrived and things started to go wrong this knowledge counted for absolutely nothing. In the heat of the moment decisions had to be made which would affect the outcome of the delivery and off all the people in the room both myself and my partner were the least qualified to make those decison, despite the research we had done. Pressing all the keys on a piano once does not make you a pianist just as &#8220;reading&#8221; about birth trauma etc does not gurantee that you will be in a position to make the &#8220;right&#8221; decsion at the time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not overly confident in the medical system in this country but last year over 8000 babies were delivered in the Coombe so the system must be working to some degree. Could it be better? Of course. Do doctors make mistakes? yes they do! Should they be held accountable? Absolutely. But IMHO, ultimately it is doctors and nurses who have both the academic and practical knowledge which gives them the edge over lay folk during any medical procedure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Oh, sorry, you said &lt;em&gt;a maternal influence is better for a small child&lt;/em&gt; and I was short handedly saying that while that may be true, living in a free society - ie one where adults have autonomy over their own person - is arguably more important to that child in the long run.

It&#039;s a debating point with no definitive answer, though, hence my saying it&#039;s even odds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sorry, you said <em>a maternal influence is better for a small child</em> and I was short handedly saying that while that may be true, living in a free society &#8211; ie one where adults have autonomy over their own person &#8211; is arguably more important to that child in the long run.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a debating point with no definitive answer, though, hence my saying it&#8217;s even odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nouns</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>nouns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Sabrina on this one. It&#039;s not an issue of the nature of the decision (and I fully agree Louis, to leave a child motherless anywhere is a very selfish decision), it&#039;s about her having the choice. This is obviously ignoring a lot of other potentially influencing factors, but the post is about the medical professionals involved not permitting her the choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Sabrina on this one. It&#8217;s not an issue of the nature of the decision (and I fully agree Louis, to leave a child motherless anywhere is a very selfish decision), it&#8217;s about her having the choice. This is obviously ignoring a lot of other potentially influencing factors, but the post is about the medical professionals involved not permitting her the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Major</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-27</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Prioritising their own needs, or their own morals, over those of a patient within her legal rights is an abuse of power.&lt;/i&gt;

Can&#039;t argue with that at all, the law is the law and all that. Morally I think she&#039;s absolutely bankrupt though.

Don&#039;t understand the first part of your comment though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Prioritising their own needs, or their own morals, over those of a patient within her legal rights is an abuse of power.</i></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t argue with that at all, the law is the law and all that. Morally I think she&#8217;s absolutely bankrupt though.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t understand the first part of your comment though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-26</guid>
		<description>20, living in a free society is better for the grown child, so it&#039;s even odds on that one IMHO.

I have worked in an A&amp;E. It is very difficult to watch people die, especially if someone can intervene to save a life. I am not unsympathetic to the difficulty the woman&#039;s healthcare practitioners were put in. But (and yes I realise this is ironic) they have a duty of care to the patient to not force them to undergo treatments they do not want. Prioritising their own needs, or their own morals, over those of a patient within her legal rights is an abuse of power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20, living in a free society is better for the grown child, so it&#8217;s even odds on that one IMHO.</p>
<p>I have worked in an A&amp;E. It is very difficult to watch people die, especially if someone can intervene to save a life. I am not unsympathetic to the difficulty the woman&#8217;s healthcare practitioners were put in. But (and yes I realise this is ironic) they have a duty of care to the patient to not force them to undergo treatments they do not want. Prioritising their own needs, or their own morals, over those of a patient within her legal rights is an abuse of power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabrina</title>
		<link>http://www.sabrinadent.com/2007/12/14/can-i-get-my-donated-blood-back/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrinadent.com/?p=89#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Louis, if this is a topic that really interests you, you could do some Google research on &quot;maternal birth trauma&quot; and &quot;cascade of intervention&quot; for a start.

I&#039;m not questioning what happened during your daughter&#039;s birth, but a lot of &quot;emergency&quot; cesareans, for example, are avoidable. Cesarean sections increased by 72% in a 10 year period in Ireland where the neo-natal mortality rate remained steady.

There is not some mysterious uterine defect suddenly affecting 72% of birthing women in Ireland. There is, however, a dramatic rush towards intervention at routine births in a hospital setting. So sadly, no, I do not trust that Doctor Knows Best in this country, not by a longshot.

Ironically, considering the issue of the original post here, if women were better educated about childbirth and therefore empowered to actually decline things like monitoring, the cascade could be avoided for a lot of these women.

On the other hand, if we had a medical culture of respect for the autonomy of the patient, instead of a cookie cutter baby birthing conveyor belt, that would help, too. Simply asking &quot;Would you like to be monitored?&quot; instead of saying &quot;Stay still so we can hook you up to the monitor&quot; would be a good start.

Of course, as you point out, most women don&#039;t seem to know they can decline the monitor. The fact that people *make other people* with less research than they put into buying a new car I do find somewhat amazing. Nobody turns up at a car dealership saying &quot;well, I won&#039;t bother with that issue of Which?, I&#039;m sure they know what they&#039;re doing.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis, if this is a topic that really interests you, you could do some Google research on &#8220;maternal birth trauma&#8221; and &#8220;cascade of intervention&#8221; for a start.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not questioning what happened during your daughter&#8217;s birth, but a lot of &#8220;emergency&#8221; cesareans, for example, are avoidable. Cesarean sections increased by 72% in a 10 year period in Ireland where the neo-natal mortality rate remained steady.</p>
<p>There is not some mysterious uterine defect suddenly affecting 72% of birthing women in Ireland. There is, however, a dramatic rush towards intervention at routine births in a hospital setting. So sadly, no, I do not trust that Doctor Knows Best in this country, not by a longshot.</p>
<p>Ironically, considering the issue of the original post here, if women were better educated about childbirth and therefore empowered to actually decline things like monitoring, the cascade could be avoided for a lot of these women.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if we had a medical culture of respect for the autonomy of the patient, instead of a cookie cutter baby birthing conveyor belt, that would help, too. Simply asking &#8220;Would you like to be monitored?&#8221; instead of saying &#8220;Stay still so we can hook you up to the monitor&#8221; would be a good start.</p>
<p>Of course, as you point out, most women don&#8217;t seem to know they can decline the monitor. The fact that people *make other people* with less research than they put into buying a new car I do find somewhat amazing. Nobody turns up at a car dealership saying &#8220;well, I won&#8217;t bother with that issue of Which?, I&#8217;m sure they know what they&#8217;re doing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
